Conclusions and recommendations
If there aren’t any recommendations to be manufactured because of the project, just call this section Conclusions.
The Conclusions section sums up the key points of your discussion, the primary top features of your design, or perhaps the significant outcomes of one’s investigation. As its function is always to round from the story of assembling your shed, it will:
- be written to relate straight to the aims associated with the project as stated in the Introduction
- indicate the extent to that your aims have now been achieved
- summarise the key findings, outcomes or information in your report
- acknowledge limitations and make recommendations for future work (where applicable)
- Highlight the usefulness or significance of one’s work.
The conclusions should relate genuinely to the aims for the work:
The aim of this project is always to design a cellular phone tower for a suburban location..
The mobile phone tower presented here can be erected safely in a suburban street.
It requires a complete area of a maximum of 2m 2 l, and it has the following safety features.
This investigation will review the amount of passengers with the Monash University Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus so that you can recommend adjustments to the ongoing service if required.
Analysis associated with survey data obtained in this project implies that usage of the Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus has increased by 24% in the past 5 years. It is strongly recommended that frequency be increased during peak usage.
The Conclusions section below is from a level 2 Civil Engineering Alternative Designs report presenting two designs for a an overpass bridge. Go through the buttons that are coloured look at comments.
All the two bridge designs Lecturer’s comment:
An elegant beginning for a Conclusions follows on neatly from the discussion that is preceding. In this case, in addition it indicates that the aims of the project have now been met. presented in this report fulfil the criteria specified within the project brief. Both designs Lecturer’s comment:
The main findings or outcomes – in this case the important thing top features of the designs – are then recapped. incorporate round piers on piled foundations, that are used because the soil conditions are unknown and perchance unstable. Design 1, a straightforward composite I-girder bridge, has got the advantage of being manufactured from steel and so has longer spans and fewer piers.
Design 2, a beam that is super-T >Design 2 Lecturer’s comment:
The significance of the results – in this case the ultimate recommendation – is clearly stated. is therefore recommended. It gives Lecturer’s comment:
To finish off, the achievement regarding the project is reinforced. an affordable overpass with superior durability, and fully meets what’s needed of this design brief.
Always address limitations and suggest how they may be overcome in future work. The excerpt below is from the Conclusions of a study on a project investigating the result of pulsation on heat transfer in horizontal pipe flow.
Experimental results Lecturer’s comment:
Key conclusions drawn from the project. indicated that pulsed flow without flow reversal had no significant effect compared with steady flow. Preliminary experiments with reversed flow, however, clearly indicated increased heat transfer. This really is likely due https://essay-911.com Lecturer’s comment:
Provide a explanation that is possible notable results, especially unexpected ones. to the large disturbances when you look at the hydrodynamic boundary layer if the flow changes direction. Further research Lecturer’s comment:
Recommend further research to handle any work that is extra think could be useful. is preferred to determine the most achievable enhancement.
It should be noted that Lecturer’s comment:
Acknowledge limitations or errors and suggest explanations solutions that are and/or. the experimental results usually do not concur with the equations that are theoretical. This might be as a result of the deposits which developed inside the pipe, or to inconsistent thermocouple temperature. Therefore, regular inspection of this test rig is recommended.
For a really long report, it really is acceptable to present the conclusions and recommendations in point form:
The prototype robot courier presented here has been shown to be capable of delivering documents autonomously in an working office environment. It has demonstrated the next the different parts of mobile robotics:
- Localisation: The Kalman filter-based localisation algorithm achieved sub-centimeter accuracy under normal operating conditions.
- Environment modelling: The occupancy map was updated dynamically to include obstacles not included in the original map.
- Path planning: A distance transform-based path planner using obstacle transforms produced a globally optimal local entrapment-free path to the target.